Five Tips for Transitioning from a Great Lawyer to a Successful Project Manager

May 2020| Rachita Maker, Vice President, Chief of Staff and Head of Legal Operations, Tata Communications Limited

Do any lawyers remember going to law school and hearing the words “project management”? I certainly did not, and I suspect most of my colleagues didn’t either. It is a different world now with a number of institutes focusing on Legal Project Management and I see there are multiple courses available on the topic. Legal Project Management or LPM is an identified functional area in The CLOC Core 12 for Legal Operations, therefore, identified as a key skill for the legal operation professional.

I chanced upon project management purely by accident in my fifth year as a lawyer. Overnight, I was handed a high-volume complex contract management project with a tight deadline. In an instant, I was made responsible for a team of twenty bright, young lawyers who were relying on me to give them guidance; a demanding client who had expectations beyond the project scope; a deliverable that I had no idea on how to execute; and a management team that wanted me to make the whole thing work. No pressure? To tell the truth, I loved the challenge and still do today.

So, for all the lawyers or legal operations professions who get thrown into large engagements or complex implementation projects, with no one to tell them how it is done – I am sharing a few of the strategies I have forged over many years of managing projects successfully in the legal services industry.

Overview of Legal Project Management

My experience has taught me to view project management as having four pillars – client management, delivery management, team and stakeholder management, and financial management.

Projects within the legal industry could include large scale contract lifecycle management implementations including data migration from old systems to new, obligations management, M&A due diligence, contract drafting and negotiations engagements, and 50-state regulatory research to name a few. Typical challenges in legal projects relate to: scope; balancing the right number resources while ensuring subject matter expertise; maintaining quality; anticipating and mitigating risks; anticipating changes in projects due to unforeseen circumstances like regulatory changes, changes in production timeline or changes in client requirements and unresponsive clients.

Below is my advice for transitioning from a great lawyer to a successful project manager that no one spoke about in law school:

1. Understand the “pulse” of your client
Understanding the “pulse” of your client – in other words, learning what they value most in the delivery of a project and why – is the key to any successful client-provider relationship. No matter what happens, you should be the go-to person for your client. Set up a communication schedule that matches your client’s needs and try to anticipate what they might need next.

I start any large project by identifying what is most critical to my client. Sometimes it is quality; other times it is timeline; and all too often it is cost. While most clients will say that ALL of those factors are equally important, there is usually one aspect that stands out as the priority.

For example, in a 50-state regulatory research project where timing is of the essence for your client, spending too much time ensuring you have researched every angle and missing the expected deadline will likely leave you with an unhappy client. In this example, setting realistic expectations up front on how the research might be restricted to meet the timeline would likely have led to the client suggesting more specific instructions to provide better focus for the research. As you build trust through a series of meetings and in meeting mutually agreed-upon expectations, the client will start to see you as an extension of their team.

The best way to set and adjust expectations is to create a regular cadence of communications that matches your client’s style. As lawyers, we tend to get so involved in our work that we wait to go to the client with our final “masterpiece”. There is nothing worse for a client than not knowing how their project is progressing. I recommend having at least a once a week check-in call, email or meeting. Depending on the timeline and scale of the project, you may want to have more frequent, shorter, or more casual conversations to establish rapport with your client. These meetings are also a great way to learn about the client and anticipate their upcoming needs.

2. Manage “scope creep”
For your clients and for your organization, success is most often measured in financial terms. As project managers, you manage the budget by avoiding “scope creep” – in other words, ensuring that the requirements of a project have not unnecessarily expanded, making the project more expensive than anticipated. Scope changes are easier to identify if a client makes explicit changes to the deliverables or timing of the project; but in practice, small accretive changes are made in smaller bits and become difficult to quantify – in other words, they creep up until the project is ultimate off-budget.

Managing scope begins even before a project starts. As more clients now want fixed pricing or alternate pricing models for projects, the days of hourly billing have almost disappeared. Clients routinely ask for a quote without giving, or sometimes not knowing, any details around the project. Imagine a template harmonization project for a large multinational company – at a minimum, it would help to know how many templates, across how many geographies, the number of business units with overlapping templates, etc. Even if you are able to get some of this information in advance, chances are that you will get answers in approximates, but the client will demand certainty on pricing. It is important to define the project scope to the best of your ability and build in strong assumptions to protect your client and your organization.

Even with the best planning, scope creep can continue through the life of the project and often happens in short bursts. Since we are anxious to maintain good client relationships and we want to earn their business, we tend to overlook the scope creep issues, often leading to unanticipated bills to the client or unsustainably low margins for your organization. I recommend logging all requested changes, no matter how small they seem at the time, and their potential impact on the project. Assess these impacts with your clients and organization at regular intervals in order to anticipate any potential changes in cost or timing. Your clients will appreciate the open communication. The alternative, which is not mentioning scope changes until it is too late, can chip away at trust with your client and your organization.

3. Measure and meet your client’s quality and timeline expectations
As lawyers, we are trained to provide high-quality work product. After all, our work product is the showcase of our talent. While it is easy to control our own deliverables and quality, it can be difficult to be responsible for what someone else is producing. The truth is that as project managers, we are responsible for the overall quality of the project. For example, whether you are overseeing 5 people working on an M&A transaction or 30 people working on a document review, you will need to ensure that quality and the timeline are met by the entire team working together.

The first step to providing quality work is to define and measure what quality means to the client. Work with your client to define quality metrics and then track them. As a project manager one should be able, at any point in time, to confidently talk about the “quality percentage” of their engagements. Tracking quality through pre-defined metrics also helps project managers identify if issues are related to a particular person or if those issues are general across the team.

While high-quality work is expected, most legal projects are deadline-driven, whether it is a deadline related to production, regulatory demands or a transaction. As lawyers, we are used to burning the midnight oil to meet our deadlines and produce the best output we can. The challenge is to help your project team stay motivated to work the extra hours when large deadlines are looming. In order to minimize all-nighters or unsustainable work hours, as well as to avoid any curveballs that may come up in a project, I usually try to build a buffer in project timelines. For example, if I have a 4-week project that needs about ten people, I will staff it with twelve people instead and set an internal timeline of 3 weeks so that I can conduct last minute checks, conduct quality review and make changes that may have come up during the life of the project.

4. Build and maintain reports that your clients and management will value
Maintaining daily, weekly and monthly reports on your engagements will benefit both your clients and your organization. As a project manager you are expected to have a real-time understanding of project metrics – whether they relate to number of documents, hours worked on the project, throughput per hour, quality measures and any other information that can be sliced and diced.

I recommend updating clients and other stakeholders with progress reports. It helps to understand your client and stakeholder communication styles and timing, and to set expectations upfront. Weekly, or sometimes daily, reports may be needed. I was once working on a project that I knew was VERY important to my CEO, and I wanted to make sure he wouldn’t wake up in the middle of the night and worry about where we were on the project. I proactively set up daily reports, and it worked wonderfully to keep my CEO updated and comfortable with the project.

There are a number of tools and technologies that can help you track the progress and performance of your project. Using automated workflow tools, you can generate delivery dashboards, quality metrics, monthly information reports, etc. These tools help you collect analytics on each activity of your project. For longer-term engagements, I have also seen the Balanced Score Card approach work beautifully with clients, as they can see a holistic view of the team’s performance based on operational and delivery excellence, client satisfaction and additional value by way of innovation. As lawyers, we are not always proficient with tools and technology in the market place, but as good project managers we need to identify the best-suited person in our team who can support us in generating and maintaining reports.

5. Invest in your team’s growth
A colleague of mine once said, “After a certain point in your career, it isn’t what your boss thinks of you, but what your team thinks of you,” and I totally agreed with her. Your team is a testament of you. A great project manager knows how to get buy-in from the team, give them the right training and resources, challenge them and use their strengths to the fullest. I try to build my project teams with complementary personality types to provide balance. No one person can do everything and most project managers think that the burden of performance is on them. The truth is that we should use our team’s strength to the fullest – this not only helps them to enhance their skills and helps them feel vested, but also takes some of the burden off our shoulders.

Remember that no matter how much you plan, there are things that may be out of your control. Great project managers focus on what is in their control, escalate what is not, identify risks early on and mitigate them to the best of their ability. As lawyers and professionals, we juggle multiple projects every day, and effective project management will help us stay organized.

Evolution of CLOC Core Competencies: Observations from a Maturing Market

We’ve met with more than 50 clients in the past 12 months and have enjoyed a front seat to the transformation happening across legal departments. Our meetings have reinforced that CLOC’s 12 core competencies are not stagnant and continue to evolve in their application and impact. Here is a taste of what we are seeing you all accomplish. You can use these to plan your next project, benchmark with your colleagues, and to continue to show the value that you bring to your legal departments and companies.

Financial Management: This has evolved into so much more than simply reporting on spend or managing to the budget. Legal departments are overlaying spend against key objectives of the company to ensure that the allocation of legal resources aligns with the strategic priorities of the company.

Vendor Management: We started with preferred vendors and negotiating favorable pricing. Legal departments are working with vendors to solve common challenges in technology, ediscovery, and more. They are also asking vendors for data dashboarding to spot trends and inform future action.

Cross-Functional Alignment: Legal operations roles are often filled with business professionals from within the company, including finance, products and IT. These hires bring with them relationships and institutional know-how, and allow companies to repurpose people, process, and technology used in the business for use in the legal department.

Technology & Process Support: Legal operations is changing the culture of legal departments by driving the adoption of technology and incorporating process-driven workflows into serving the business.

Service Delivery & Alternative Support Models: This is not just about insourcing versus outsourcing. It is about right sourcing the work to ensure that tasks are assigned to the right resource. This allows everyone on the team to focus on the high-impact and high-value work. Legal operations professionals are shining a light on churn and helping legal departments to stop doing tasks that don’t bring value.

Organizational Design, Support & Management: Legal operations departments are no longer behind the scenes. The groups are front and center within legal departments and the business. Legal operations professionals are increasingly leading pitch meetings, panel selection, fee negotiations, and outside counsel evaluations, and have more optics into organizational changes impacting their legal departments.

Communications: Together with their GCs, legal operations departments are helping accelerate change and are creating innovation fluency about the company’s business and legal industry. At legal department meetings, they are highlighting how technology is transforming their business, mapping legal goals to innovation objectives of the business, and are training on skills core to legal operations. At legal department retreats, they are changing the curriculum to include design thinking sessions, technology updates, and data metrics discussions. They are also bringing together outside counsel to share innovation success stories so that they may be replicated across all firms supporting the company.

Data Analytics: Using data, legal operations is changing the conversation about value. What is the business goal for the matter? How will success be measured? Are legal resources aligned to the business’s strategies? Legal operations departments are driving the creation of dashboards to spot trends, inform future action, and identify missed opportunities. They are also capturing knowledge about the performance and use of their outside counsel. This includes tracking who at what firms have done work in particular areas for the company, working toward a future where legal operations can provide predictive analytics on who is best suited to solve a specific problem for the business.

Litigation Support & IP Management: Legal departments are partnering with IT to bring even more of the ediscovery lifecycle in-house. Teams from information security, IT, internal investigations, and legal operations are working together to show how particular license offerings can reduce spend exponentially. They are using advanced features to identify risk before litigation and are reducing their digital footprint with their vendors by 50 to 90%.

Knowledge Management: In response to the needs of the business, especially during periods of rapid growth, legal operations departments are creating on-demand, self-service legal solutions for their internal customers. To do so, they scope what the business needs, how much of the need requires interaction with a lawyer, and what portion can be solved with automation and standardization. These solutions are driven by playbooks, AI and legal bots.

Information Governance & Records Management: Legal operations departments are creating programs that provide the business better access to information so that it can harness data for a strategic advantage and, in some cases, monetize that data. They are driving the creation of policy and procedure that is practical and enhances service to the business. They are also complying with emerging data privacy laws and protecting against data breach and the associated reputational damage.

Strategic Planning: Legal operations leaders are reporting directly to their general counsel and are helping set the strategy and goals for the legal department. They increasingly have a seat at the table and are measuring their achievement and performance against the established goals for the legal department.

 

Transformation and Change Management: What on Earth is That, Anyway?

If we had a dollar for each time we read or heard the words ‘legal services transformation’ or ‘change management’ recently, the Elevate team would be travelling to the CLOC 2019 Sydney Institute first class all the way!

Today’s legal ecosystem is engaged in breathless pursuit of innovation; captivated by enticing opportunities to transform service delivery by combinations of technologies, novel service models and an array of management methodologies; ranging from Lean, to Design Thinking and Legal Project Management (to name just a few!). In the in-house environment, Legal Ops is at the epicentre, supporting and enabling legal teams to achieve the optimal blend of value, quality and cost efficiency.

At this year’s CLOC Sydney Institute, we will hear about exciting legal department change journeys and opportunities to deploy new technology and ideas. All change in legal services environments requires significant investment in planning and management. It is no accident that change capability forms part of “Strategic Planning” in the CLOC 12 Core Competencies Model, and that legal departments performing at the “Mature” level plan to manage change.

But what exactly are legal services transformation and change management? In this post, we will demystify these terms and consider the role of Legal Ops in the successful execution of change.

Change Transformation

Simply put, change is discontinuing something old for something new. For legal departments, change impacts important building blocks such as vision or strategy; governance, rules and policy; business processes and technology systems; performance management, org design, people and culture, or a combination of the above. Change involves modification in how legal departments perform their work, the work environment, or how clients consume the output of their efforts. Change initiatives intend to produce benefits in efficiency, effectiveness or quality. Given the proliferation of LegalTech, many change projects are prompted by new technology.

Change falls on a spectrum: on the left, incremental evolution of one (or more) of the legal department building blocks described above. On the right, transformative change involves a fundamental and structural disruption to the status quo. Needless to say, not all change is truly transformative and approaches should be calibrated accordingly.

Digital transformation for legal departments is the technology-enabled realignment of vision, processes, service delivery models and client experiences to achieve digitisation of services and defined business goals. It is occurring in concert with business and societal shifts of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, catalysed by ‘always-on’ connectivity, advanced data analytics and breakthrough developments in AI, triggering revamping of processes, workforce skillsets, technology and data environments, and strategies to respond to the opportunities and challenges of digital commerce.

Regardless of whether change is incremental or transformative, it is always much harder to do than describe. However, all legal departments must hone their change skills to get fit for the future of legal service delivery.

Sometimes… things change and they are never the same again. This looks like one of those times. That’s life! Life moves on. And so should we.– Spencer Johnson, 1990 “Who Moved My Cheese”

Lawyers Hate Change!

Lawyers score highly (certainly higher than the population average) on traits such as scepticism, cynicism, impatience and introversion, and typically score lower on collaboration and trust in others.[1] Some speculate that training in precedent and jurisprudence predisposes lawyers to instinctively prefer what has gone before. Despite this, there is no definitive evidence to show that lawyers dislike change more than anyone else.

Humans are pre-configured to operate subconsciously through powerful, trained patterns resulting from ingrained habits and behaviours, values and belief systems, individual experience, comfort, references and routines. We also place more value in the things we already have or know, and have an innate bias for the status quo. In other words, we incline towards what we know rather than embracing alternatives, even when rationally and logically presented.

Worse still, people typically react to change with counter-productive emotional responses, including shock and denial, frustration and unhappiness. These reactions, if not carefully managed, can provoke complex change resistance behaviours, the most toxic of which are passive subversion of the change project, withdrawal of cooperation or disengagement.

Against that backdrop, it is unsurprising that up to 70% of work-related change projects fail to realise promised outcomes.[2] Invariably, the causes are people factors and resistance to change. The technical aspects of deploying technology or revised business processes are straightforward by comparison with the human wildcard.

Legal departments are organised systems of people, so these forces are multiplied and compounded. Busy legal professionals scarcely have enough time to work in the business, let alone manage change. This is where Legal Ops can provide tremendous value.

The Good News

Legal departments are resourced by intelligent, motivated and analytical professionals who are receptive to change when presented in a structured, digestible way which clearly and consistently articulates why change is needed.There’s more good news. While the legal sector is facing the challenges of disruption later than many of our business and professional colleagues, we can benefit from the research, theory and methodologies long since established in other domains, and employ it to our advantage. Most important is adoption of the discipline of change management.

Change Management and the Role of Legal Ops

The Change Management Body of Knowledge (CMBoK) published by the Change Management Institute defines change management as a structured approach to transitioning individuals, teams and organisations from current state to a desired future state. It offers a management methodology for planning change activity, and a human-centred way of managing people factors, drawing on expertise from diverse fields including organisational psychology, sociology, project management, design theory, process improvement, systems theory and management consulting.

The use of structured change management is vital for successful change for legal departments, which is why change management forms part of the CLOC Core Competency ‘Strategic Planning.’ Legal Ops can deliver tremendous value by ‘owning’ the space, leveraging change management tools, techniques and internal/external professionals, and ensuring suitable planning and delivery governance.

Change Management in Practice

There are multiple competing Change Management theories, from Kotter’s 8 Steps, to Lewin’s Change Model, to McKinsey’s 7-S and ADKAR. Each has relative pros and cons (though this blog is not the place to weigh them). Each is intended to help prepare the organisation and its people for structured, well-planned change, involving well-defined goals, support and consistent communication. Arguably, for legal departments, it is less important which model is preferred than to select just one, and use it effectively. With its multi-disciplinary expertise, understanding of process and technology, and horizontal view of the entire legal department, Legal Ops should provide pivotal support in the design and performance of high-quality change management.

Conclusion

The future of legal service delivery will require legal departments to be more agile in how they adopt new tools, methods, service models and ideas, and this requires significant investment in ‘operationalising’ change processes. Legal Ops professionals are perfectly positioned to play an instrumental role in this space.

In the coming weeks, we will be publishing more tips on executing successful change on our blog. You may visit our booth at the CLOC Sydney Institute 2019 and to speak with Steven Walker, James Odell or Jon Kenton about Elevate’s unique Elevated Transformation approach for successful legal department change.

About Elevate

Elevate is a global law company, providing consulting, technology and services to law departments and law firms. The company’s team of lawyers, engineers, consultants and business experts extend and enable the resources and capabilities of customers worldwide. Elevate is the most-used law company according to the 2017 State of the Industry Survey published by the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium (CLOC) and has been ranked as a top global legal services provider by Chambers & Partners for four years in a row. More at elevateservices.com

[1] Herding Cats: the Lawyer Personality Revealed (2002) Richard, Dr. L available at https://www.lawyerbrain.com/sites/default/files/caliper_herding_cats.pdf and Alvey, J., (2010) More on the Lawyer Personality https://leavinglaw.wordpress.com/2010/12/01/more-on-the-lawyer-personality/

[2] Nohria, M., & Beer,M (2000) https://hbr.org/2000/05/cracking-the-code-of-change